Abstract
Environmental law in India has played a pivotal role in balancing economic development with ecological sustainability, with the Supreme Court emerging as a crucial actor in shaping environmental
jurisprudence. However, the ways in which courts frame environmental concerns significantly influence judicial decision-making, policy formulation, and public discourse. This thesis investigates the
legal narratives surrounding environmental issues in Indian judicial decisions, analyzing how courts
construct arguments around environmental protection, economic growth, and social justice. By applying computational methods to a curated dataset of Supreme Court judgments, this research uncovers
patterns in legal argumentation and broader ideological shifts within environmental jurisprudence.
While traditional legal scholarship has extensively examined the doctrinal foundations of environmental
law, there remains a significant gap in understanding the rhetorical and structural aspects of judicial
decision-making. This study addresses this gap by adopting a computational humanities approach, employing natural language processing (NLP) and statistical analysis to identify dominant themes and
argumentative strategies in environmental case law. Through topic modeling and citation analysis, this
research maps the evolution of environmental jurisprudence in India, highlighting the judiciary’s role in
shaping governance mechanisms and regulatory frameworks.
The findings reveal critical insights into the judiciary’s framing of environmental issues. The study identifies the predominance of individual appellants in environmental litigation, suggesting a growing public
engagement in environmental advocacy, but also underscores the limited participation of institutional actors such as state governments and NGOs. The thematic analysis of case topics shows that courts focus
heavily on constitutional rights, pollution control, and land disputes, while areas such as biodiversity
conservation and hazardous waste management receive comparatively less judicial attention. Additionally, the temporal analysis of forest rights cases demonstrates how legislative interventions, such as the
Forest Rights Act (2006), directly influence litigation trends, reaffirming the judiciary’s role in shaping
environmental governance.
This study also examines the legal principles that form the foundation of environmental jurisprudence
in India, particularly the interpretations of Articles 14, 21, and 32 of the Indian Constitution. By analyzing landmark cases, the research highlights how the Supreme Court has expanded environmental rights
under Article 21’s ”Right to Life,” employed the Public Trust Doctrine, and developed principles such as ”Polluter Pays” and ”Precautionary Principle.” The increasing reliance on Public Interest Litigations
(PILs) has democratized access to environmental justice but has also led to concerns about the potential
misuse of this legal mechanism.
The study’s methodological innovation lies in leveraging computational techniques for legal analysis.
By integrating large-scale text mining with qualitative legal interpretation, this thesis offers a data-driven
perspective on judicial reasoning. The citation analysis of frequently referenced cases, laws, and precedents provides insights into how legal arguments evolve over time. The application of NLP techniques
enables the identification of implicit biases in judicial narratives, revealing recurring themes and the
ideological underpinnings of environmental litigation.
Despite its contributions, the research acknowledges certain limitations, including the reliance on a
specific dataset and the challenges of drawing strong correlations between case topics and appellant
types. Future research could expand this work by conducting comparative studies across different jurisdictions, exploring regional variations in environmental litigation, and incorporating qualitative insights
from legal practitioners.
Ultimately, this thesis contributes to a deeper understanding of how environmental concerns are framed,
contested, and adjudicated in India’s judicial system. By bridging environmental law with computational humanities, this study not only enriches legal scholarship but also provides valuable insights for
policymakers, environmental activists, and legal practitioners. As climate change and sustainability debates gain prominence, the role of the judiciary in environmental governance will continue to shape the
trajectory of India’s environmental policies and legal frameworks